February 17, 2007

  • Rumor has it that it's time for me to update.  It's been a long dry spell, hasn't it?  Fortunately I don't feel any sort of  obligation to update every day.  In fact, I think it's counterproductive, as most readers don't go back and read previous entries.  So I leave each entry up there for a while.

    Well, we had our blizzard, as did many of you.  Still digging out four days after the big storm, which was supplemented by about three more inches of snow last night. 

    Such an event brings out, if only momentarily, the best in human nature.  I met all sorts of neighbors I didn't know I had, receiving help and then offering it.  But yesterday I got a brusque call from the guy who had given my truck  temporary refuge in his parking lot, ordering me to remove it.  And I could find no one to help me shovel out a parking space.  So I soldiered through it, gasping for breath after about every fifth shovelful, feeling faint like I was going to pass out or have a heart attack.  But alas, no heart attack this time.  Just a very tired John, with an old truck that is now ensconced in a parking space on the street and isn't going anywhere for a while.  I REALLY don't know how my father shovelled snow when he was 79 years old.

    Most days recently I wake up hyperventilating.  When I'm lying in bed I feel like my lungs aren't expanding at all, and I can't get enough air.  I don't know if it's fear, sleep apnea (which I've been told I have) or merely emphysema from years of smoking, firefighting, and breathing radon-saturated air in my current basement apartment.  Probably all of the above.

    The other day I dreamed about Xcholo4u .  The details are fuzzy now, but the dream had something to do with God.  He was asking me if I was ready to meet God, something like that.  I didn't have the answer.  All I could do was hyperventilate.

    Tax season is upon us.  And Xcholo4u was complaining the other day about taxes.  I feel his pain, of course; no one likes taxes (and I pay 'em too even on my minuscule disability pension).  Especially since our perception is that most of our taxes go for things that don't directly benefit us, like war and corruption.  But I had to remind him to be grateful that he earns sufficient money that taxes constitute a significant chunk of change for him.  Not all are so fortunate.

    More importantly, people who complain about taxes utterly miss the point.  It ABSOLUTELY DOESN'T MATTER how much or what percentage of our income we pay in taxes.  What matters instead is two things: (1) whether or not we can buy the necessities of life, and perhaps a few of the luxuries, with the money left over after we've paid our taxes; and (2) what we get in exchange for our taxes.

    People in most of Europe pay WAY more in taxes than we do.  In the Scandinavian countries the income tax is somewhere around 70%.  Yet most of them live a solidly middle class life.  They buy homes and cars, and somehow pay the $6.00/gallon for gas.  They have jobs with shorter work weeks, 8 weeks of vacation a year, and well-paid early retirements.  Their taxes buy them such things as fully-paid national health insurance.  Their countries are NOT trying to dominate the world militarily; even the Germans seem to have finally learned THAT lesson.  Europeans exceed Americans in the vast majority of quality-of-life measures.  There is relatively little homelessness and poverty in Europe, and the disparity between rich and poor isn't nearly as great as it is here in America.

    This brings me to a fork in the road involving two different discussions: (1) my economic theory that, if I were an economist and a college
    professor someplace, would earn me the Nobel Prize in Economics; and  (2) the role played in our lives by what a friend and I have termed, in our conversations, our national "core cultural values".

    The economic theory is relatively easily disposed of.  It is this:  A family's purchasing power expands and contracts according to the average discretionary income in the society.  That is poorly stated and could be refined, but let me illustrate with the simple example that gave rise to my theory in the first place.  In America in the 1950's and 1960's the top marginal tax bracket was 70%, and few women worked outside the home.  Yet the average middle class family, with only one wage earner, could afford to buy a house.  Then in the 1970's women began to work outside the home in far greater numbers, and the top tax bracket was gradually reduced.  Therefore a lot more discretionary income, right?  Not for long.  Immediately the price of homes began to rise, until it consumed the gains made in discretionary income.  Today most Americans are NOT better off than they were in the 1950's, and an ordinary family needs two incomes in order to be able to buy a house.

    The reverse would also be true.  If taxes were once again raised in order to fund, say, national health insurance, the price of homes would fall in direct ratio.  It's a manifestation of the good old capitalist supply-and-demand principle.  Which brings me back to what I said above.  Asking how much we pay in taxes is asking the wrong question.

    Let me save my discussion of America's core cultural values for another day.  Meanwhile have a good weekend, y'all.  Keep yer whistles wet and yer powder dry.

    P.S.: My daughter e-mailed me yesterday, wanting a copy of my 2005 W-2 form (in my case it's a form 1099-R) because she's applying for financial aid for graduate school, and apparently parental income and assets are still a factor for her.  Her request provided me with the opportunity to coin one of my little aphorisms.  You may quote me if you like.  Here it is:

    "That's the great thing about kids....they're always there for you when they need something!" 

January 28, 2007

  • My Old Man

    Note: I keep editing this.  It's a work in progress, it seems.  Something in me is deeply invested in this, and wants to make it perfect.

    **********

    He was 43 years old when I was born.  Because my mother didn’t have time to make
    it to the hospital, he delivered me himself in their Chicago apartment, on the mattress on the floor which served as their bed.  He had absolutely no idea what he was doing.  The umbilical cord was wrapped twice around
    my neck.  It’s a miracle that I lived.

    While my friends’ youthful dads were taking them out to the
    baseball diamond to teach them the fundamentals of baseball, my father was too
    old to run, and when we tried to play catch his elbow hurt him.  I didn’t understand.  He did gamely serve one year as an assistant coach on my minor league baseball
    team, hitting fly balls to the outfielders.  He had a funny hitch in his swing, and he
    missed the ball about half the time.  I
    stifled a groan, embarrassed to acknowledge him as my dad.

    Every weekday he got up at 6:00
    AM and went to work.  I could
    hear his hacking coughs when he got out of bed, from the two packs of
    cigarettes a day that he smoked.   The coughing would sometimes go on for 15
    minutes.  But he never missed work.  And he never uttered a word of complaint.

    My dad worked for the same company for 44 years, spanning portions of six decades, in a
    warehouse.  With his two years of college, relatively rare for that time, he was nevertheless a laborer during the Roaring Twenties; during the Great Depression; during World War II, when he was just barely too old to go fight the Nazis.  At age 19 I got a little taste of working in that same warehouse, unloading railroad cars, lifting an average of  30 tons a day one bag or box at a time.  My dad had not even had the advantage of an electric pallet mover.

    At some point he traded his blue collar for a white one, becoming some sort of low-level managerial
    functionary.  I never quite understood what he did.  In my family my dad’s meager earnings
    were “our money”, while my mother’s small but significant inheritance was “her
    money”. 

    When he retired in 1971, my dad was making about the same
    amount of money that I would soon earn in my first full-time job, and my parents had still
    not paid off their two-bedroom house in the white working class South Side ghetto.  They never had
    a new car until my father’s elderly mother bought him a Ford Pinto as a retirement
    gift.  Prior to that I can remember him
    down on his knees in the cracked driveway, age 55 or 60, applying body putty to our
    cars’ rusted-out metal, and screwing plywood over the holes where the floorboards
    used to be.

    My dad did all of the grocery shopping, and about half the
    housework.  He vacuumed the carpet, and
    washed the dishes every night.  On the
    weekends my mother, who did not work outside the home and had only the one
    child, would hand him a list of chores to do. 
    She would stand at the window and blow him a kiss as he drove away in
    the car to run errands.  He always did the
    chores without a word of protest, even when she told him to paint the white plastic
    lawn sprinkler a bizarre shade of maroon mahogany to match the trim on the
    house, or to install seven locks on the back door.  He was forever painting something at her whim, and laying
    flagstones where there should have been grass. 
    I perceived my father as a wimp for being so subservient to my mother, and I resolved to be nothing like him.

    When my friends and I grew tired of the underground tunnel
    we had dug in my back yard, my father the wimp  spent a weekend filling in the hole.  When we eventually wearied of the cabin we had
    erected, he spent another weekend tearing down the cabin and hauling away the wood in the family station wagon.

    My father had been married before, to a woman who ran off
    with another man and left him with an infant daughter to support and raise.  Unable to raise her without help, he was
    forced to leave her with his parents who lived far away.  Then for the fifteen years before I was born,
    my father was an alcoholic.  He went from
    work to the bar to his bed to work to the bar to his bed.  He had no friends that I was ever aware
    of.  I called that period of his life the
    “blank period”, because he would never speak of it.  My mother apparently got him to finally quit
    drinking by locking him out of their apartment until he could come home sober.

    My mother tried to teach me to drive when I was 16, but she
    was too high-strung, and made me nervous by screaming at me.  My old man sat stolidly in the passenger’s
    seat and never uttered a word, and I learned to drive.  “Phlegmatic” was my father’s middle name, it
    seemed.

    The time eventually came when I had grown taller and bigger and
    stronger than my dad.  I could finally
    beat him at checkers.  Feeling my
    youthful oats, I would punch him playfully on the arm and call him “Old Sis”.  I thought I detected a certain
    sad wistfulness in his face, but he never said a word.

    Fast forward to the time when my second wife left me and took my nine-month-old daughter out of state.  In my anguish I was resolved to lie in bed and starve myself to death, but my parents talked me into staying at their house.  For six months I spent every moment when I wasn't at work lying on their couch, with my face to the wall, like King David after the death of his child.  My father had no words of wisdom for me, but he spent hours playing card games with me, to try to distract me from my depression.

    The only advice my father ever gave me in life was during that period, when I was about
    36 years old.  “Never expect anything
    from anyone,” he said.  “That way you’ll
    never be disappointed.”  But when I occasionally
    left town in the winter, he would go over to my house and shovel my snow on
    his 79-year-old legs.

    When I was 38 and my father was 81 he went into the hospital,
    saying simply that he wasn’t feeling very well, and died.  Lung cancer, the Medical Deities eventually proclaimed.  He was on a respirator in intensive care for
    a couple of weeks, so he couldn’t talk. 
    After several days someone finally figured out that maybe, if they gave him a
    pad of paper and a pencil, he could communicate by writing.  Standing at his bedside, I breathlessly
    awaited the wisdom that I was sure would finally pour forth from him.  “My lips are dry,” he wrote.  He did later scrawl that he loved my mother,
    but he never wrote anything to me.

    After my dad was gone, I cleaned the clothes out of his
    closet and dresser.  It took only a few hours to dispose of all of his worldly goods.  Most of his clothes were too outdated and
    raggedy to even take to the Salvation Army. I could see where he had tried to prolong the life of his work shoes - shoes I had given him - with some kind of glue.  He was forever tinkering with stuff, but never quite succeeded in repairing it.  I kept his little old pocket knife.

    Following his passing, my mother and I got along worse than
    ever.  I realized that, even though he
    never said much of anything, my dad had somehow served as a buffer between the strong personalities of my
    mother and me.

    Now my father has been dead for almost 20 years, and I’m the
    age he was when he was trying to play catch with me.  I can’t run, and I can’t throw.  I have no job, and haven’t owned a home in
    years.  I wasn’t a wimp with women the way my dad was,
    and consequently I have two divorces to show for my pains.  Yet I turned out to be a great deal like him in
    some very fundamental ways.  I now
    understand that life had kicked his ass pretty bad, and his untiring devotion
    to my mother was born out of gratitude for her love in his otherwise arid life, imperfect and incomplete
    though that love may have been.

    The other morning I woke up unexpectedly crying for my dad.  He'd be exactly 100 years old if he was still alive.  I love you, Old Sis.  I miss the hell out of you, you phlegmatic
    old fart.  I wish we had gotten to know one another better, BEFORE you died.

January 17, 2007

  • The Heavy Heart Has Not a Humble Tongue

    There's a woman who lives in Pittsburgh named Kathy Jo.  She has written copiously for years on usenet as "Whorella" among other pseudonyms, long rambling stream-of-consciousness posts that are in large part self-referential but also impassioned analyses of the "larger issues" of social justice that concern, or should concern, all of us.  She has had a couple of her own newsgroups, and has also posted on others such as alt.prisons.  She has had an extremely colorful life.  She's a real character, absolutely fearless and uncensored.  I used to read her regularly, and still do from time to time.  Sometimes Whorella makes complete sense to me, while at other times I think she's over the top.

    There was one exchange between her and another woman on alt.prisons that struck me as quite profound.  It's relevant to far more than just prisons.  I reprint it here in its entirety.  Read it at your peril.  If you don't like long posts or stream-of-consciousness monologues or profanity in the service of a greater wisdom, then it's not for you.

    **********
    > Newsgroups: alt.prisons
    > From: "Linda C." <l...@wolfstar.com>
    > Date: Sun, 8
    Sep 2002 15:13:58 -0400
    > Subject: Re: love
    >
    > Whorella,
    >
    > Maybe if you'd leave the anger outside the room where
    your keyboard resides
    > someone would have some compassion and respond. 
    Personally, I think you're
    > so full of hate and anger that nothing I might have to
    say would make a
    > difference.  Your language is vulgar and offensive
    to me.  Maybe no one else
    > will tell you that but whatever compassion I might have
    for your situation
    > is lost because of the energy you are projecting. 
    There are many people in
    > this world who are hurting and they do it in a quiet,
    gentle way.  Those are
    > usually the people who get offers of help.  Maybe
    you need to see yourself
    > as you present yourself to others in order to see what
    the real problem is.
    > I wish you healing!

     
    > Newsgroups: alt.prisons
    > From: "Federal Bureau of Blowing Whorella"
    <blow...@verizon.net>
    > Date: Thu, 12
    Sep 2002 20:26:58 GMT
    > Subject: A HEAVY HEART HAS NOT A HUMBLE TONGUE
    >
    > this is the one place i thought people would understand
    anger.
    > outrage.  and they would if only i wouldn't swear.
    >
    > but no ... we have the language cop here telling me
    she'd offer
    > her unlimited advice if only i'd stop offending her
    with what is
    > my normal behavior. i had no idea this group would be
    so white
    > so i'm sorry if that makes me sound racist but dubyah
    please.
    >
    > and she's offended? tell me how to act? no that's not
    offensive,
    > just offering advice in love and kindness. well keep
    it. please.
    > or start swearing and maybe i'll be your friend
    > and let you help me. but obviously you have nothing to
    offer me anyway.
    >
    > you'll deny that you tried to tell me how to act,
    > only that if i want help, i better change how i act
    > and not be so offensive. on alt. prisons.
    > it's always for our own good, right fellahs? ain't it?
    >
    > i thought it would take way more to offend someone
    here.
    > so sensitive. but if people won't help me because i
    swear,
    > they don't have the kind of help i need anyway.
    >
    > do you know without anger, nothing in this world would
    change?
    > that jesus overturned the tables of the money changers.
    angry.
    > guess they nailed his ass to the cross for telling the
    sanhedrin
    > to blow him and get their money out of the temple.
    > they still haven't learned that lesson. funny, ain't
    it?
    >
    > did you know that one generation's profanity is
    another's nonprofanity?
    > christ you couldn't say 'bra' without people blushing
    20 years ago
    > and they used to do gyne examinations while a woman was
    fully dressed
    > with her leg on a stole while a doctor stuck his hand
    in her
    > with his head turned the other way? shit now they dope
    you up fuck you
    > and charge you for it. crazy world but don't swear.
    >
    > and no most doctors are fine or some so you can't judge
    them all.
    > but when it comes to the justice system it will. not
    just a criminal.
    > i mean this guy has a life and family so we don't want
    to put him in jail.
    > but if you have nothing to lose, too bad. so on one
    hand they say,
    > we don't want to ruin the good people but "jails
    are not bad".
    >
    > cicero, that dirty ancient bastard, said a woman should
    lay her modesty
    > aside with her petticoats before making love. i agree
    completely. that was
    > considered profane.
    >
    > shakespeare swore. i mean the list of writers in the
    english
    > canon .... can you imagine DH lawrence without
    profanity?
    > the list is endless. it's not that swearing that makes
    it good,
    > it's the honesty that reaches through the boundaries
    > that separate us by stupid shit like whether we swear.
    > as if it means we have some kind of self-restraint.
    >
    > i don't demand others swear like i do
    > and yet it's still totally kosher to work the other way
    > because the default on 'good' is on the clean mouthed.
    > but by who? netiquette? telling me how to act. no.
    >
    > i don't want my word usage restrained by someone else's
    sensitivity
    > when we lived in a world drenched with profanity.
    > i saw a burger king commercial with the guy driving
    along
    > acting like his wife is about to go down on him ... a
    commercial.
    >
    > so poor darling nancy,
    i'm truly sorry you're so sensitive.
    > with this heathen world, you mustn't be able to even
    watch a movie
    > without being offended. you are over the age of 10,
    right?
    >
    > LINDA, YOU KNOW THEY USED TO FUCKING LOCK PEOPLE UP FOR
    SWEARING?
    > you'd be down for that. you would. fascism is always so
    modestly dressed.
    > polite.
    > not swearing is about respect. no. telling me how to
    act according to your
    > values,
    > that's tyranny, which has been blowing me since the
    dawn of man
    > and i still haven't gotten off. man.
    >
    > and poor linda is probably flabbergasted 'well i'm the
    most well liked
    > person on this group and i'm just the nicest little
    thing and how can
    > whorella be mean to me since i'm so above any behavior
    i could be criticized
    > for? i just said i was offended by her. not attacking
    her."
    >
    > they are the same no matter what rhetorical tricks you
    use to work around
    > it. i read it all. brecht. orwells great piece on
    jargon and speech and the
    > ways we use speech to hide what we're doing. i know ...
    how people try and
    > work on you. but i'm not supposed to be pissed. phew.
    >
    > i don't know how you live in this world if you can't
    deal with
    > the most basic profanity. seriously. i pity you.
    >
    > remember silence of the lamb "i can smell your
    cunt'
    >
    > chef fucking brocket from the neighborhood of make
    believe, was the guy in
    > that movie. a lot of it was filmed in pittsburgh.
    he swore. even though fred
    > rogers
    never did when i worked for him.
    >
    > yeah. i answered fred's fan mail and didn't swear
    because it wouldn't have
    > been right.
    >
    > but on alt.prison? you gotta blow me while everyone
    watches.
    >
    > no swearing please
    >
    > get the fuck out ... man. that is so funny
    > tell me how to act out here.
    >
    > your compassion? angry people can't swear
    > or it interferes with your compassion?
    > i have to pass some test to earn your concern?
    > then it becomes worthless. and no. i'm not treating
    > you with respect now. sure your tone was mild
    > compared to mine but i will not respect those
    > who have none for me. i call it 'kissing ass' and i
    won't do it.
    >
    > fuck you and your compassion. how's that?
    > all about love are we? as long as i maintain your
    standard of speech?
    > so you're like the language warden here? assembly of
    god member maybe?
    >
    > if you truly cared, you would have ignored the language
    and helped me,
    > right?
    > saw that 'this child is obviously hurting so much it
    has overflowed into
    > anger'
    >
    > isn't that what christ said? what you do for the people
    who use bad
    > language,
    > you do for me?
    >
    > but no. not worthy. i swore.
    > seriously you made my day.
    > alt.prison. i heard it on the pearl jam group
    > even though eddie vedder swears all the time.
    > it's okay if rock stars to do it. funny.
    >
    >  i don't see how you other people get through the
    day without being outraged
    > but as long as we have the language and emotion police
    to keep us in line
    > we can continue grabbing our ankles and taking whatever
    the bush family and
    > their flunkies
    > stick up us. until we get to like it. thank jesus for
    our many blessings.
    > like KY jelly: TV
    >
    > MY HEART IS BREAKING and all you see is that i'm
    swearing?
    > if your help is conditional on accepting your standards
    ... that's coercion.
    > plain and simple.
    >
    > so no, i wasn't looking for someone to tell me how to
    act.
    > but for an ex-con who understands these things of
    loving a man in jail.
    >
    > or do they all stop swearing when they get out of jail
    > and fear my anger so they back off. so scared of little
    old me.
    > finally servile. finally beat.
    > boy they are improving things at the DOC.
    >
    > prisons are making bigger pussies out of convicts than
    i thought.
    > boy that george bush must get great ideas while golfing
    >
    > HELLO HELLO IS THIS THING WORKING CAN YOU HEAR ME?
    >
    > we are living in the midst of an atrocity
    > men turned into animals in the name of morality and
    corrections
    >
    > but oh no, we wouldn't want to raise our voices.
    > won't voice our outrage.
    > we might offend someone.
    >
    > well this world offends me.
    > we tolerate poverty but not profanity.
    > we walk over the homeless
    > but if only they were more like us,
    > we'd help. but they're not so they can lay there and
    die.
    > who gives a fuck? it's all their fault.
    >
    > fuck that.
    >
    > 'THE HEAVY HEART HAS NOT A HUMBLE TONGUE'
    >         william
    shakespeare from love's labour's lost
    >
    > that's the whole problem with liberals. sooo polite.
    > offering so much but demanding so much more than they
    offer.
    >
    > all these poor people are getting fucked right in the
    bumbum (see how i
    > didn't say "ass" because i'm good)
    > in menial low paying jobs and get sick of it and go off
    doing wild shit.
    > then they're animals. bad criminals. but oh we care.
    yes we do.
    > we care about showing the world how fucking caring we
    are.
    > and caring people don't get angry. that would make them
    > like the animals they care so much about.
    >
    > if only we could get the bad people to act like us good
    people,
    > then everything would be fine! yeah! and if they don't,
    we'll leave them
    > to starve and shit. but hey we tried.
    >
    > and then, after that, don't expect the discarded to be
    pissed
    > or the compliant to not be pissed that they are forced
    to lie
    > and supplicate themselves for the pleasure of a meal
    consisting of rotten
    > meat.
    >
    > and we're talking about profanity.
    >
    > 1 out of 7 people are being sentenced to death although
    they're innocent.
    > but don't swear. don't get angry. no one will listen.
    >
    > WELL YOU'RE WRONG. YOU'RE TALKING TO THE WRONG PEOPLE.
    > FUCK THE LEGISLATORS. WE NEED TO REACH THE BEER
    DRINKERS.
    > THE FUCKING LOSERS WHO DON'T VOTE.
    > THEY'LL HEAR THIS. THEY'LL PAY ATTENTION TO THIS.
    > AND THEY WELL GET PISSED. AND THEY WILL ... VOTE!!!
    > and then ... the shit will hit the fucking fan.
    >
    > it's coming ... it is ...
    >
    > people are pissed. they understand the swearing.
    > and they're just words. my god.
    > i refuse to surrender my anger.
    > it has saved my life.
    >
    > i have never struck another human being
    > but ... if i saw someone being hurt,
    > i would. sure. i think ... there are times
    > that life demands it. sure, you can stand there and die
    > like christ ... but now we love martyrs who fly
    airplanes into buildings
    > because they love god so much and think to die for god
    is so great so ...
    > jesus.
    >
    > aw ... this world is magic and green and the sun warms
    like an embrace and
    > god just the sound of water slipping over rocks wants
    me to make love to the
    > whole world but i can not understand the pettiness and
    the anger of the
    > world although i know i participate but i just can not
    see not trying to ...
    > demand more of this unlimited Eden
    if it weren't for fear ... and yet ...
    > people ... whew ...such willing victims ... and i see
    how it happens through
    > weapons of emotional control ... and shaming us for
    feeling angry or jealous
    > when we see how little we have while others have so
    much, we're taught to
    > blame ourselves and turn our shame on ourselves in a
    variety of forms of
    > self destruction or addiction.
    >
    > not this whore. no shame. i lived with it for years.
    being raped and
    > honestly feeling like i deserved it. you watch jody
    foster in the accused,
    > that was my life. doctor fingering me like he's trying
    to fuck me while
    > asking details. an hour after i was raped. big nice
    doctor, right? just a
    > rapist with a mask. dick.
    >
    > so ... they say profanity is only for people too stupid
    to find a way to
    > articulate themselves intelligently. tell that to saul
    bellows or
    > christopher hitchens or alice
    walker. please. don't swear. only means you're
    > stupid. don't even fucking try it with me.
    >
    > and nancy,
    don't be angry and swear at me.
    > you're the bigger person. man it must get lonely up
    there.
    > it gets mighty lonely down here, too.
    >
    > but you have to rise above this response
    > and don't say suck my dick or anything.
    > and to further protect yourself from other things that
    might offend you,
    > don't watch tv or someone might say a naughty word.
    > oh and don't be mad on a prison group.
    >
    > my boyfriend was killed in there. murdered.
    > and you deny me an emotional vehicle to express my
    outrage?
    > ew ... it's mind control at its most heinous form
    > disguised as civility. it's fucking gross. really.
    >
    > or maybe you lost someone in prison
    > and have rose above it and don't swear or get upset.
    > i swear to god i owe it to timmy to never surrender
    > my outrage in what happened to him.
    >
    > i never avenged his killer.
    > i was a fucking full-time on-the-masthead journalist at
    the time.
    > i had access to every document about it.
    > but i knew whoever got caught,
    > would go to the electric chair.
    > and i would have nothing to do with it. no way.
    >
    > so no. i didn't avenge his death that way.
    > i'm not vengeful. but i am outraged.
    > there is a difference. there really is.
    > timmy's not the only one.
    > one year as many people were killed in that prison
    > as in the whole city. yeah. yeah. i'm angry.
    >
    > angry. i hate that word. how they sterilize the
    outrage.
    > no. i'm not angry. people are dying. and i'm fucking
    pissed.
    >
    > or convicts dying in prison, just one of life's
    mysteries i guess.
    > that shouldn't piss you off. part of god's plan.
    > say the serenity prayer:
    >
    > god, grant me the serenity to blow the people i have to
    blow,
    > to get the people who have to blow me, to do it right
    > and the wisdom to remember i'm the only one who can do
    it right anyway.
    >
    > anger does not always lead to violence
    > but some of you will never understand that.

January 12, 2007

  • Lemming Ratiocination

                                                    h_11_ill_854596_070112_gorce

    Translation:  "Do you realize the number of those who would die for nothing if we stopped
    now?"

January 11, 2007

  • Support Our Troops? A Poem for Mr. Bush (and You)

    Bagram, Afghanistan, 2002

        The interrogation celebrated spikes and cuffs,
        the inky blue that invades a blackened eye,
        the eyeball that bulges like a radish,
        that incarnadine only blood can create.
        They asked the young taxi driver questions
        he could not answer, and they beat his legs
        until he could no longer kneel on their command.
        They chained him by the wrists to the ceiling.
        They may have admired the human form then,
        stretched out, for the soldiers were also athletes
        trained to shout in unison and be buddies.
        By the time his legs had stiffened, a blood clot
        was already tracing a vein into his heart.
        They said he was dead when they cut him down,
        but he was dead the day they arrested him.
        Are they feeding the prisoners gravel now?
        To make them skillful orators as they confess?
        Here stands Demosthenes in the military court,
        unable to form the words "my country". What
        shall we do, we who are at war but are asked
        to pretend we are not? Do we need another
        naïve apologist to crown us with clichés
        that would turn the grass brown above a grave?
        They called the carcass Mr. Dilawar. They
        believed he was innocent. Their orders were
        to step on the necks of the prisoners, to
        break their will, to make them say something
        in a sleep-deprived delirium of fractures,
        rising to the occasion, or, like Mr. Dilawar,
        leaving his few possessions and his body.

        - Marvin Bell, The New Yorker, 8 Jan. 2007

    Have a nice day.

January 5, 2007

  • Clinically Speaking, Is Dubya a Sociopath?

    I was recently referred to an interview with Justin A. Frank, M.D., author of "Bush on the Couch".  He posits that Bush Jr., our pResident, has sociopathic personality disorder.  I've been pretty certain of this for years, but it's nice to have it confirmed by a "mental health professional".  Here's the link:  http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/interviews/049

    In other news, below is a brief commentary on Bush's latest "signing statement", a device he has pioneered and perfected - no doubt at the instigation of his handlers - as a way to negate the intent of the legislation he's signing, and to impose his unilateral executive will on our unsuspecting asses.

    Apparently in December, Bush added a signing statement to a
    bill related to the US Postal Service.  Though the bill
    "explicitly reinforced protections of first-class mail from
    searches without a court's approval", Bush's signing statement
    construes an exception "which provides for opening of an item
    of a class of mail otherwise sealed against inspection in a manner
    consistent ... with the need to conduct searches in exigent
    circumstances."

    But of course, we're always living in an emergency.   So our
    administration has given itself license to open any postal mail
    it deems interesting.

    A "top Senate Intelligence Committee aide" promised that this
    signing statement is "something we're going to look into."

    Article, originally from the New York Daily News, at
    http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0104-01.htm

    EDIT:  Here's a little movie especially for Trun(sic)thePaige, who takes pleasure in calling me a fool for believing that Saddam Hussein received assistance from the United States in developing his weapons of mass destruction program: 

    Have a nice day.

December 30, 2006

  • Get It While It's Hot

    Yes, get it while it's hot....my vicarious response to the death of Saddam Hussein, and to Xcholo4u's recent post about it.

    December 30, 2006
    The Independent (UK)

    A Dictator Created Then Destroyed by America
    Robert Fisk

    Saddam to the gallows. It was an easy
    equation. Who could be more deserving of that last walk to the scaffold - that
    crack of the neck at the end of a rope - than the Beast of Baghdad, the Hitler
    of the Tigris, the man who murdered untold hundreds of thousands of innocent
    Iraqis while spraying chemical weapons over his enemies? Our masters will tell
    us in a few hours that it is a "great day" for Iraqis and will hope that the
    Muslim world will forget that his death sentence was signed - by the Iraqi
    "government", but on behalf of the Americans - on the very eve of the Eid
    al-Adha, the Feast of the Sacrifice, the moment of greatest forgiveness in the
    Arab world.

    But history will record that the Arabs and other Muslims and,
    indeed, many millions in the West, will ask another question this weekend, a
    question that will not be posed in other Western newspapers because it is not
    the narrative laid down for us by our presidents and prime ministers - what
    about the other guilty men?

    No, Tony Blair is not Saddam. We don't gas
    our enemies. George W Bush is not Saddam. He didn't invade Iran or Kuwait. He
    only invaded Iraq. But hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians are dead - and
    thousands of Western troops are dead - because Messrs Bush and Blair and the
    Spanish Prime Minister and the Italian Prime Minister and the Australian Prime
    Minister went to war in 2003 on a potage of lies and mendacity and, given the
    weapons we used, with great brutality.

    In the aftermath of the
    international crimes against humanity of 2001 we have tortured, we have
    murdered, we have brutalised and killed the innocent - we have even added our
    shame at Abu Ghraib to Saddam's shame at Abu Ghraib - and yet we are supposed to
    forget these terrible crimes as we applaud the swinging corpse of the dictator
    we created.

    Who encouraged Saddam to invade Iran in 1980, which was the
    greatest war crime he has committed for it led to the deaths of a million and a
    half souls? And who sold him the components for the chemical weapons with which
    he drenched Iran and the Kurds? We did. No wonder the Americans, who controlled
    Saddam's weird trial, forbad any mention of this, his most obscene atrocity, in
    the charges against him. Could he not have been handed over to the Iranians for
    sentencing for this massive war crime? Of course not. Because that would also
    expose our culpability.

    And the mass killings we perpetrated in 2003 with
    our depleted uranium shells and our "bunker buster" bombs and our phosphorous,
    the murderous post-invasion sieges of Fallujah and Najaf, the hell-disaster of
    anarchy we unleashed on the Iraqi population in the aftermath of our "victory" -
    our "mission accomplished" - who will be found guilty of this? Such expiation as
    we might expect will come, no doubt, in the self-serving memoirs of Blair and
    Bush, written in comfortable and wealthy retirement.

    Hours before
    Saddam's death sentence, his family - his first wife, Sajida, and Saddam's
    daughter and their other relatives - had given up hope.

    "Whatever could
    be done has been done - we can only wait for time to take its course," one of
    them said last night. But Saddam knew, and had already announced his own
    "martyrdom": he was still the president of Iraq and he would die for Iraq. All
    condemned men face a decision: to die with a last, grovelling plea for mercy or
    to die with whatever dignity they can wrap around themselves in their last hours
    on earth. His last trial appearance - that wan smile that spread over the
    mass-murderer's face - showed us which path Saddam intended to walk to the
    noose.

    I have catalogued his monstrous crimes over the years. I have
    talked to the Kurdish survivors of Halabja and the Shia who rose up against the
    dictator at our request in 1991 and who were betrayed by us - and whose
    comrades, in their tens of thousands, along with their wives, were hanged like
    thrushes by Saddam's executioners.

    I have walked round the execution
    chamber of Abu Ghraib - only months, it later transpired, after we had been
    using the same prison for a few tortures and killings of our own - and I have
    watched Iraqis pull thousands of their dead relatives from the mass graves of
    Hilla. One of them has a newly-inserted artificial hip and a medical
    identification number on his arm. He had been taken directly from hospital to
    his place of execution. Like Donald Rumsfeld, I have even shaken the dictator's
    soft, damp hand. Yet the old war criminal finished his days in power writing
    romantic novels.

    It was my colleague, Tom Friedman - now a messianic
    columnist for The New York Times - who perfectly caught Saddam's character just
    before the 2003 invasion: Saddam was, he wrote, "part Don Corleone, part Donald
    Duck". And, in this unique definition, Friedman caught the horror of all
    dictators; their sadistic attraction and the grotesque, unbelievable nature of
    their barbarity.

    But that is not how the Arab world will see him. At
    first, those who suffered from Saddam's cruelty will welcome his execution.
    Hundreds wanted to pull the hangman's lever. So will many other Kurds and Shia
    outside Iraq welcome his end. But they - and millions of other Muslims - will
    remember how he was informed of his death sentence at the dawn of the Eid
    al-Adha feast, which recalls the would-be sacrifice by Abraham, of his son, a
    commemoration which even the ghastly Saddam cynically used to celebrate by
    releasing prisoners from his jails. "Handed over to the Iraqi authorities," he
    may have been before his death. But his execution will go down - correctly - as
    an American affair and time will add its false but lasting gloss to all this -
    that the West destroyed an Arab leader who no longer obeyed his orders from
    Washington, that, for all his wrongdoing (and this will be the terrible get-out
    for Arab historians, this shaving away of his crimes) Saddam died a "martyr" to
    the will of the new "Crusaders".

    When he was captured in November of
    2003, the insurgency against American troops increased in ferocity. After his
    death, it will redouble in intensity again. Freed from the remotest possibility
    of Saddam's return by his execution, the West's enemies in Iraq have no reason
    to fear the return of his Baathist regime. Osama bin Laden will certainly
    rejoice, along with Bush and Blair. And there's a thought. So many crimes
    avenged.

    But we will have got away with it.

December 24, 2006

  • Holiday Jollity

    Please forgive me if you've already seen these....

    image011     image015 
                                   image016    
                                  image010

    And have yourself a merry little Christmas....

December 21, 2006

  • Holiday Wisdom

    As I'm sure you have discovered by now, I am a veritable fount of wisdom, a cornucopia of cognitive coruscation.  I very recently dispensed some of that wisdom in a comment on Kestryl's site.  But her posts are protected, and every time she posts a new one she hides or deletes the previous one.  So my wisdom will be lost to posterity unless I share it here.  And here it is:

    1) Vocabulary words are like smiles and like love itself: the more you use them, the more you have of them.

    2) That old cliche, "Absence makes the heart grow fonder," isn't always true.  Here is the full quote, from the French writer/philosopher La Rochefoucauld.  No one seems to be aware of this except me.  I'm translating from the French, so if it sounds just a bit odd to English-speaking ears, that is why:  "Absence increases large passions and diminishes small passions, as the wind fans a fire but blows out a candle."

    That's all the wisdom I can think of at the moment.  If I come up with more I'll surely let you know.

    Incidentally, I still haven't received any nude audition photos from nubile females willing to help Theologian Dan beat YouTube.  Quite frankly, I am shocked and appalled by the lack of pictorial response to my previous post.

    God bless us every one.

December 18, 2006

  • Boob Tube

    I think this is important enough from a global historical perspective to belabor the point a bit further.  This just in - Theologian Dan's second message regarding his grand YouTube plan:

    ***For everyone who wants to help out with the youtube project, this is
    how it will work. I am having people read my post into a camera or
    webcam. Then we will use those as the tapes for youtube. So if you want
    to go through my old post and read them, we can use your help. I have
    been watching youtube traffic. I have noticed that women tend to get
    more traffic once they are on the high view page. So I need attractive
    women to read the post. No offence to nonattractive women. Make sure
    you read and it sounds natural. You don't want to look like you are
    reading it. Also make sure you look directly into the camera for the
    entire video.

    Now I will need the help from the ugly people too. Hey, we are all
    in this boat together. Not all of us can be drop dead beautiful. So I
    need help from people who spend a lot of time in front of the computer.
    You don't have to know anything about youtube or making videos to make
    this work.

    If you can help, let me know. I do want to mention something. This
    will get a ton of traffic. So if you can't handle that, you may not
    want to participate. People can be mean online and there will be
    negative comments and people saying whatever. So don't participate in
    the video part unless you can take that.

    Dan

    Originally sent to: TheTheologiansCafe's friends***

    In the spirit of Xanga solidarity, with no ulterior motives, I have volunteered to help Dan by determining which women are attractive enough to read his posts into the camera, and which are too ugly.  I've informed him that I have a lot of experience in this area.  We'll see if he selects me...

    Meanwhile, if you're a woman who is interested in taking part in this groundbreaking project, you could e-mail me nude photos of yourself so that I could be pre-screening you on Dan's behalf. 

    Theologian Dan would seem to be one who operates on the philosophy that ANY publicity, even bad publicity, is good for him.  I am obviously playing right into his hands here.