October 31, 2007

  • Absence

    Happy Halloween, one and all!

    As a far more well-known author said a century or so ago, the reports of my death are greatly exaggerated.

    And as one of my favorite philosophers, the French sage La Rochefoucauld, once observed, "Absence increases large passions and diminishes small passions, as the wind fans a fire but blows out a candle."

    So most of you have probably not even noticed that I was gone.

    I've been spending a lot of time on Facebook recently.  "Now why," I'm sure you'll ask, "would an old fart like you, John, be hanging out on Facebook?"

    Well, it's fun.  You can play "Scrabulous" with people.  You can take various tests to see how well you know your friends, how compatible you are with them, etc.  You can send them hugs or beer or....well, anything you want.  I sent one guy, someone I know well whom I  was pretty sure would get the humor and not be offended - a hand job. 

    Here on Xanga one has to write thoughtful essays.  And sometimes I just get tired, or haven't anything to say, or feel that you've already heard everything I have to say.  I might want to just hug you or send you a condom as an extra-special gift, and I can't really do that on Xanga.

    Xanga's weakness is also its strength, though.  On Facebook you're pretty much limited to people who are already your friends, as it seems rather hard to go about making NEW friends on Facebook.  Sure, you can have a million friends in your "network" if you want, but they're merely friends of friends of friends, and you don't really KNOW them.  You don't want to be sending THEM a tube of K-Y Jelly.  You don't have anything to say to them at all.

    Here on Xanga we get to know one another, often fairly intimately, through our essays and the comments thereupon, and we can actually  make new friends.  So if we're willing to put the work in, Xanga can pay great rewards.

    I reckon I'll be bouncing back and forth between the two worlds.  If you like to play Scrabble....errr, Scrabulous....come and find me on Facebook.  I've got a surprise gift waiting for you.    Meanwhile I'll be getting around to your Xanga sites and leaving my pithy little comments every once in a while.

    God bless us every one.

    P.S.: I continue to be grateful to anyone who is still listening to my world music show at WEFT on Thursday afternoons from 2 to 4 PM Central time.  And of course there are the podcasts....

    EDIT:  Several of you have expressed varying degrees of interest in Facebook.  Unless you went to my college or high school or work at my company, I don't know how to find you unless you send me an e-mail.  Once you're in my webmail address book, then Facebook can track you down.  I have no idea how civildis found me yesterday.  You can't simply search for a person by name on Facebook.

October 19, 2007

  • Chris Dodd and Me

    I'm not quite sure how it happened, but Senator Christopher Dodd and I are on a first-name basis, and he writes to me.  A lot.  So I took the liberty of composing and sending this little reply to one of his more intimate missives.

    Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:54:00 -0400 (EDT)

    From: Chris Dodd
    <chris_dodd@chrisdodd.com>
    Reply-To:
    chris_dodd@chrisdodd.com
    Subject: Holding the
    line on the rule of law

    John,

    It's been a busy day, but I wanted take a moment and let you know that I have decided to place a "hold" on legislation in the Senate that includes amnesty for telecommunications companies that enabled the President's assault on the Constitution by providing personal information on their customers without judicial authorization.

    I said that I would do everything I could to stop this bill from passing, and I have.

    It's about delivering results -- and as I've said before, the FIRST thing I will do after being sworn into office is restore the Constitution.

    But we shouldn't have to wait until then to prevent the further erosion of our country's most treasured document.

    That's why I am stopping this bill today.

    I've gotta run, but please visit my campaign website for more details.

    http://www.chrisdodd.com/fisa

    Chris

    Chris, I'm not sure how you and I got to be on a first-name basis, but I like it.  I like it a lot.  I'm very flattered, actually.  I'm hoping that you'll invite me over to your house sometime, and maybe help me qualify for things like Medicare, Section 8 housing, etc.

    Meanwhile, I'm going to go out on a limb here.  I'm going to presume on our budding friendship to remind you, just between you and me, that there really is no such thing as the "rule of law".  It's a myth.  It's kind of like that alternative version of the Golden Rule: "Them that has the gold makes the rules."  The rule of law, properly stated, is this:  "Them that has the power declare what the 'rule of law' is at any given moment in time."

    I studied law for four years, and tears used to roll down my cheeks as I learned in detail just how politicized and ideological the Supreme Court actually is, how profoundly unjust our "justice" system is, how greatly the scales of justice and mercy are weighted against the poor and disenfranchised.  When America's greatest Supreme Court Chief Justice, John Marshall, can invoke the "law of discovery" and the "law of conquest" as ex post facto rationales for flagrantly stealing land from Native Americans, as he did in a famous early case, one realizes with a crashing vengeance just how hollow the "rule of law" really is.

    And Chris...the Constitution doesn't merely need to be restored.  It needs to be revisited, revamped, revitalized, to account for the profound changes in American life over the past 218 years.  Our Founding Fathers, the "Framers" as they're called, apparently didn't anticipate the Industrial Revolution and the rise of multinational corporations.  Until the corporations - and those whose unquestioning loyalty they're able to purchase at the highest levels in the federal government - are brought under some measure of control and accountability, the Constitution will be constitutionally unable (if you'll pardon the pun) to establish Justice, promote the general Welfare, and do those other things that it declares as its purpose in the Preamble.

    "Accountability" is a key word here, Chris.  We've misplaced it in America.  We've somehow lost sight of the notion that a government's sole legitimate purpose is to enhance the quality of life for ALL of its citizens AND their posterity, not just the top 1% in the short term.  Until our elected representatives recognize and reclaim that notion of genuine accountability, America will continue to rot from the inside out just as every other Empire throughout history has done.

    The U.S. doesn't have far to go before it collapses like an empty suit of clothes with no body inside, Chris.  I know this with absolute certainty, and deep in your heart you know it too.  It's all up to you.  I hope you respect my intelligence and integrity enough to do what you have to do to make America the great country it COULD be.

    Your new friend,

    John

October 10, 2007

  • North, South, East, WEFT....

    In a rapidly orbiting space capsule with zero gravity, what's a Muslim astronaut to do?  How does he, for example, face Mecca when he prays?  As the capsule oscillates supersonically between day and night, when should he fast?

    Fortunately, as Malaysia's first astronaut blasts off today from Kazakhstan, Muslim clerics have furnished him with a comprehensive guidebook on how to comport himself properly in outer space. 

    Sat Oct 6, 2007 2:35am EDT

    KUALA LUMPUR (Reuters) - Malaysia has come up with the world's first
    comprehensive guidebook for Muslims in space as its first astronaut prepares to
    go into orbit next week.

    The book, entitled Guidelines for Performing Islamic Rites at the
    International Space Station, teaches the Muslim astronaut how to perform
    ablutions, determine the location of Mecca when praying, prayer times, and how
    to fast in space, the Star newspaper reported on Saturday.

    "The reason we formulated guidelines for Muslims in space is because we
    wanted to ensure our astronaut could fully concentrate on his mission, without
    having to worry about how he should perform his religious obligations in space,"
    Abdullah Md Zin, a minister for religious affairs, was quoted as saying.

    The 18-page guidebook will be translated into English, Russian, Arabic and
    possibly more languages for the benefit of future Muslim astronauts, he
    said.

    Sheikh Muszaphar Shukor, an orthopedic surgeon and university lecturer from
    Kuala Lumpur, will leave Earth from Kazakhstan's Baikonur launchpad for Russia's
    International Space Station (ISS) on Wednesday.

    The 34-year-old Malaysian has said he will try to observe as much of the
    Muslim fasting month of Ramadan in orbit as possible. The lunar month, during
    which Muslims fast from dawn to dusk, is due to end around October 13.

    Saudi Prince Sultan bin Salman, who was the first Muslim in space, had said
    that although he managed to pray and fast, he was not able to face towards Mecca
    and could not fully kneel on the ground.

    Here's the link, though I don't know why you'd need it:

    http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSKLR33337720071006

    In other news, in case you can't listen to my world music show live on Thursday afternoons, you can find podcasts here, as well as a brief description of my show:  http://www.esnips.com/user/NSEWEFT .  There's currently only one podcast posted there, from a show I did back in May, but I intend to try to post them weekly as soon as I can figure out all of the details.  eSnips, incidentally, is a great web site where you can have up to 5 GB of space, free of charge, to post video, audio, photos, text - whatever you want.  You essentially have your own free web site.

    I've noticed that, whereas in the early days of the internet there was a rather clear distinction between web sites, usenet forums, "bulletin boards", etc., in recent years most sites on the web have come to resemble some slight variation of multimedia-capable blogs.

    Happy hump day, for those of you who are still young and agile enough to hump. 

September 29, 2007

  • The Jena 6

    Many thanks to all who listened to my world music radio show last Thursday afternoon.  I know that at least two of you did.  I hope that more of you can check it out in the weeks to come.  My goal is to have at least 50 listeners per week from Xanga. 

    I also hope that most of my readers are by now familiar with the "Jena 6" case, which has recently come into the  worldwide media spotlight due to massive demonstrations down in Jena, Louisiana.  If you're not familiar with it, and if you think that overt racism is largely a thing of the past in America, here's a fairly comprehensive 4-minute education for you that will remind you of the Scottsboro Boys case back in the 1930s:

    http://bravenewfilms.org/blog/11298-the-jena-6-why-black-men-need-lobbyists?play=1

    [I wish I knew how to display the actual screen in my blog, but maybe that's something you can do only with Xanga Premium?]

    I even learned a few details I didn't know from watching this little film.   I DO know that this is still, in 2007, far from an isolated incident.

    It's beyond dispute that white folks in general are absolutely terrified of young black males.  If you have an opinion on the subject, I'd be interested in hearing why you think this is so, and how we as a society might go about altering the perception.

    God bless us every one.

September 24, 2007

  • North, South, East, WEFT

    Well, Fratmom has let the cat out of the bag.    The community radio station I'm involved with, WEFT (weft.org), is now webcasting.  If you're ever free and near a computer on a Thursday afternoon between 2:00 and 4:00 PM central time, you can go here  http://s9.viastreaming.net/7510/  and fire up your media player of choice (Winamp works well for me), and you should be able to listen to me doing my world music show.  It's called "North, South, East, WEFT", and I figuratively circumnavigate the globe (generally excluding Europe, whose music I tend not to like though I love the continent) to bring you the best of the world's new music.

    [EDIT:  There is now a link directly from the weft.org site to the web streaming server, a green square or box that says "Listen Online".  It's in the upper right corner of the home page.  We've been having problems, though,  staying online.  Perhaps the problems will be resolved by Thursday.  Even if it says "currently offline" try to connect using one of your computer's media players, and you may be successful.  This transition to webcasting may require a few weeks to get all the bugs ironed out.  Thanks for your patience.]

    I typically start out with a Native American track, then some Cajun/zydeco, Hawaiian, Caribbean, and/or reggae.  The second half hour is Latin music.  The third half hour is what I call my "sacrosanct African half hour", and the fourth half hour is generally Asian/Indian/Middle Eastern music, or sometimes an eclectic blend of whatever else I find interesting.  My format is pretty standardized, because my theory is that if a given listener likes, say, African music, they know which half hour to tune in.  The downside, I guess, is that if they can't listen at that particular time, they're out of luck, at least on Thursdays....

    We have general world music Monday through Friday between 2:00 and 4:00 PM.  Each DJ has his/her own format and musical preferences, so no two days are the same.  We also have a number of more specialized world music shows scattered throughout the week - reggae, Latin, Jewish, Greek, Celtic, classical Indian, etc.  I'm the world music "genre director" at WEFT, so in the past three years I've become pretty familiar with the whole gamut of world music.

    Whatever else you do, at any rate, I want you to listen to MY show at least once.    If I know you're listening, I'll give you a shout-out on the air, and maybe dedicate a song to you.   If you phone in to the station you can even request a particular song or artist, and I'll try to find it if I can.  Happy listening!

    Speaking of Fratmom, I just this very day enjoyed a sweet but all-too-short visit with her as she was traveling home from her daughter's house.   She and I had corresponded before, of course, but we had never met in the flesh.  We had a lovely 2-hour lunch at an Indian restaurant before she had to get on the road again.  What a delight she is!

    I have so far greatly appreciated and been blessed by my Xanga relationships.  But on the flip side, go here

    to read about an internet relationship - an obsessive romance - that went horribly awry.  This real-life narrative has more twists and turns than an O. Henry short story or three months in the Big Brother house, and is definitely a cautionary tale that is well worth your time to read.

    All right, enough personal stuff.    I'll be back in a week or so with some more exciting and challenging political commentary! 

September 19, 2007

  • Bad Boys, Bad Boys....

    Whatchoo gonna DO when they come for YOU???? 

    I'm sure by now most of you have heard about the student at the University of Florida who was repeatedly tased by campus cops for asking visiting speaker John Kerry some questions about the 2004 elections, and recommending a BOOK by Greg Palast.  Here are a couple of versions of the video: 

    http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/18/student.tasered.ap/index.html


    http://youtube.com/watch?v=6bVa6jn4rpE

    Note the guy's fellow students just sitting there, doing nothing, some of them even smiling, and John Kerry at the podium first offering to answer the student's questions and then making a little joke, never intervening. 

    On YouTube there are a number of video responses to the incident also, some of them quite thoughtful.  I especially like the one by a guy, apparently a U. of Florida student or former student and former member of student government, who calls himself TheRadikal and has a web site, TheRadikal.com .

    And then there's this:

    Published on Wednesday, September 19, 2007 by TruthDig.com

    Checkbook Imperialism: The Blackwater Fiasco

    by Robert Scheer

    Please, please, I tell myself, leave Orwell out of it. Find some 
    other, fresher way to explain why “Operation Iraqi Freedom” is 
    dependent upon killer mercenaries. Or why the “democratically elected 
    government” of “liberated” Iraq does not explicitly have the legal 
    power to expel Blackwater USA from its land or hold any of the 50,000 
    private contractor troops that the U.S. government has brought to 
    Iraq accountable for their deadly actions.

    Were there even the faintest trace of Iraqi independence rising from 
    the ashes of this failed American imperialist venture, Blackwater 
    would have to fold its tents and go, if only in the interest of 
    keeping up appearances. After all, the Iraqi Interior Ministry 
    claimed that the Blackwater thugs guarding a U.S. State Department 
    convoy through the streets of Baghdad fired “randomly at citizens” in 
    a crowded square on Sunday, killing 11 people and wounding 13 others. 
    So the Iraqi government has ordered Blackwater to leave the country 
    after what a government spokesman called a “flagrant assault … on 
    Iraqi citizens.”

    But who told those Iraqi officials that they have the power to 
    control anything regarding the 182,000 privately contracted personnel 
    working for the U.S. in Iraq? Don’t they know about Order 17, which 
    former American proconsul Paul Bremer put in place to grant 
    contractors, including his own Blackwater bodyguards, immunity from 
    Iraqi prosecution? Nothing has changed since the supposed transfer of 
    power from the Coalition Provisional Authority, which Bremer once 
    headed, to the Iraqi government holed up in the Green Zone and 
    guarded by Blackwater and other “private” soldiers.

    They are “private” in the same fictional sense that our uniformed 
    military is a “volunteer” force, since both are lured by the dollars 
    offered by the same paymaster, the U.S. government. Contractors earn 
    substantially more, despite $20,000 to $150,000 signing bonuses and 
    an all-time-high average annual cost of $100,000 per person for the 
    uniformed military. All of this was designed by the neocon hawks in 
    the Pentagon to pursue their dreams of empire while avoiding a 
    conscripted army, which would have millions howling in the street by 
    now in protest.

    Instead, we have checkbook imperialism. The U.S. government purchases 
    whatever army it needs, which has led to the dependence upon private 
    contract firms like Blackwater USA, with its $300-million-plus 
    contract to protect U.S. State Department personnel in Iraq. That is 
    why the latest Blackwater incident, which Prime Minister Nouri al- Maliki
    branded a “crime,” is so difficult to deal with. Iraqis are 
    clearly demanding to rid their country of Blackwater and other 
    contractors, and on Tuesday the Iraqi government said it would be 
    scrutinizing the status of all private security firms working in the 
    country.

    But the White House hopes the outrage will once again blow over. As 
    the Associated Press reported on Monday: “The U.S. clearly hoped the 
    Iraqis would be satisfied with an investigation, a finding of 
    responsibility and compensation to the victim’s families - and not 
    insist on expelling a company that the Americans cannot operate here 
    without.” Or, as Ambassador Ryan Crocker testified to the U.S. Senate 
    last week: “There is simply no way at all that the State Department 
    Bureau of Diplomatic Security could ever have enough full-time 
    personnel to staff the security function in Iraq. There is no 
    alternative except through contracts.”

    Consider the irony of that last statement - that the U.S. experiment in 
    building democracy in Iraq is dependent upon the same garrisons of 
    foreign mercenaries that drove the founders of our own country to 
    launch the American Revolution. As George Washington warned in his 
    farewell address, once the American government enters into these 
    “foreign entanglements,” we lose the Republic, because public 
    accountability is sacrificed to the necessities of war for
    empire.

    Despite the fact that Blackwater USA gets almost all of its revenue 
    from the U.S. government - much of it in no-bid contracts aided, no 
    doubt, by the lavish contributions to the Republican Party made by 
    company founder Erik Prince and his billionaire parents - its 
    operations remain largely beyond public scrutiny. Blackwater and 
    others in this international security racket operate as independent 
    states of their own, subject neither to the rules of Iraq nor the 
    ones that the U.S. government applies to its own uniformed forces. 
    “We are not simply a ‘private security company,’ ” Blackwater boasts 
    on its corporate website. “We are a professional military, law 
    enforcement, security, peacekeeping, and stability operations firm. … 
    We have become the most responsive, cost-effective means of affecting 
    the strategic balance in support of security and peace, and freedom 
    and democracy everywhere.”

    Yeah, so who elected you guys to run the world?

    Robert Scheer is editor of Truthdig.com and a regular columnist for 
    The San Francisco Chronicle.

September 12, 2007

  • Don't read if you think the environment is expendable

    From an online magazine called "Grist", which offers "Environmental News and Commentary":

    http://www.grist.org/feature/2007/09/04/change_redux/?source=most_popular


    Consider Using the N-Word Less

    Voluntary actions didn't get us civil rights, and they won't
    fix the climate

    By Mike
    Tidwell

    04 Sep 2007

    Strange but true: Energy-efficient light bulbs and hybrid
    cars are hurting our nation's budding efforts to fight global warming.

    More precisely, every time an activist or politician hectors the public
    to voluntarily reach for a new bulb or spend extra on a Prius,
    ExxonMobil heaves a big sigh of relief.

    Scientists now scream the news
    about global warming: it's already here and could soon, very soon, bring
    tremendous chaos and pain to our world. The networks and newspapers have begun
    running urgent stories almost daily: The Greenland ice sheet is vanishing! Sea
    levels are rising! Wildfires are out of control! Hurricanes are getting bigger!

    But what's the solution? Most media sidebars and web links quickly send
    us to that peppy and bright list we all know so well, one vaguely reminiscent of
    Better Homes and Gardens: "10 Things You Can Do to Save the
    Planet." Standard steps include: change three light bulbs. Consider a hybrid car
    for your next purchase. Tell the kids to turn out the lights. Even during the
    recent Al Gore-inspired Live Earth concerts, the phrase "planetary emergency"
    was followed by "wear more clothes indoors in winter" and "download your music
    at home to save on the shipping fuel for CDs."

    Nice little gestures all,
    but are you kidding me? Does anyone think this is the answer?

    Imagine if
    this had been the dominant response to racial segregation 50 years ago.
    Apartheid rules across much of our land and here are three things you can do:
    Take time, if possible, to feed three negroes who seek food at your lunch
    counter each month. Consider giving up your use of the N-word, or at least cut
    down. And avoid vacationing in states where National Guardsmen are needed to
    enroll blacks in public schools.

    Obviously, there are times in history
    when moral, economic, and national-security wrongs are so huge that appeals for
    voluntary change are not only wildly insufficient but are themselves immoral as
    a dominant national response. By 1965 we had appropriately banned
    racial discrimination in housing, employment, voting, and other realms of
    national life. The majority of Americans understood this to be the only
    appropriate response to a colossal national injustice.

    Meanwhile, global
    warming represents an even greater source of potential human suffering, not just
    to us, but to all humans -- and not just now, but for centuries to come. And yet
    there is precious little popular discussion of banning the abusive practices
    that directly create violent climate change. Like Jim Crow practices, we must by
    law phase out completely the manufacture of inefficient light bulbs and
    gas-guzzling cars, as a serious start to fighting this problem.

    Next
    time Aunt Betty goes to buy bulbs at the CVS, there should only be
    climate-friendly fluorescents for sale. When she shops for her next car, there
    should only be 50-mpg models across the lot, the sort even Detroit
    admits it can readily build.

    Of course, there are politicians and
    activists already out there passionately calling for dramatic statutory
    responses to global warming. But they are mostly drowned out by the "10 Things
    You Can Do" chorus. And it turns out the voluntary "green your lifestyle" mantra
    may in fact discourage even individual change. One British study found that
    people tend to respond in one of two ways when told simultaneously that global
    warming is a planetary emergency and that the solution is switching a few light
    bulbs: they conclude that a) the problem can't be that big if my few bulbs can
    fix it, so I won't worry about any of it; or b) I know the problem is huge and
    my little bulbs can't really make a difference, so why bother?

    While I
    do believe we have a moral responsibility to do what we can as individuals, we
    just don't have enough time to win this battle one household at a time, street
    by painstaking street, from coast to coast.

    Here, finally, are the only
    facts that matter. First, global warming is a full-blown emergency and
    we have very little time to fix it. Second, ours is a nation of laws and if we
    want to change our nation -- profoundly and in a hurry -- we must change our
    laws. I'd rather have 100,000 Americans phoning their U.S. senators twice per
    week demanding a prompt phaseout of inefficient automobile engines and light
    bulbs than 1 million Americans willing to "eat their vegetables" and voluntarily
    fill up their driveway and houses with the right stuff.

    The problem at
    hand is so huge it requires a response like our national mobilization to fight
    -- and win -- World War II. To move our nation off of fossil fuels, we need
    inspired Churchillian leadership and sweeping statutes a la the Big War or the
    civil-rights movement.

    So frankly, I feel a twinge of nausea now each
    time I see that predictable "10 Things You Can Do" sidebar in a well-meaning
    magazine or newspaper article. In truth, the only list that actually matters is
    the one we should all be sending to Congress post haste, full of 10 muscular
    clean-energy statutes that would finally do what we say we want: rescue our
    life-giving Earth from climate catastrophe.

    Mike Tidwell is director of the U.S. Climate
    Emergency Council
    and the Chesapeake Climate Action Network based in Takoma
    Park, Md.

September 9, 2007

  • What qualities are most important for a political figure to have?

    I just answered this Featured Question, you can answer it too!

    What qualities are most important for a political figure to possess?  Finally a question interesting enough to respond to.  It's fairly simple, though.  Here's what I look for (and rarely find) in a political candidate:

    1) Personal integrity.  This includes, of course, not only a consistent and comprehensible set of moral/ethical  principles, but a refusal to compromise one's fundamental principles for political expediency and/or for personal gain.

    2) Related to number 1, a world view whose emphasis is on a profound respect for the dignity of ALL humans, and
    on what has been termed "social justice". 

    This would include the notion
    of "the commons" - that there are certain inalienable rights which we
    all hold in common, and which cannot be sold to the highest bidder. 
    For me, these rights include access to the basic necessities of life,
    such as land, shelter, food, transportation, health care, and environmental protection, without regard for ability to
    pay.  It's a modified form of socialism, similar to what is practiced in most of the world's other industrialized societies.  Implicit in it is a redistribution of income and assets at the extremes of the bell curve such that there would be a certain leveling of society into the middle class.

    3) Historical perspective, long and deep.  It's been said that anyone who fails to learn from history is condemned to repeat it.  A political leader condemns the REST OF US to suffer the consequences of his/her own failure to learn from history.

    In my lifetime, the only serious Presidential candidate who has embodied all of these qualities has been Ralph Nader.  Bobby Kennedy might have had he not been killed, and perhaps Gene McCarthy.  Martin Luther King and Randall Robinson, both African-Americans, possessed the characteristics but were not politicians in the conventional sense.

    It's hard to evaluate people until they've actually held political office.  But Ralph Nader has exhibited a long lifetime of remarkable integrity, consistency, and accomplishment on behalf of ALL Americans.

    EDIT:  4) Good lookin' with big tits.  I can't IMAGINE how that slipped my mind!  A thousand thanks to Mr. Vaccerelli for reminding me!

    I just answered this Featured Question, you can answer it too!

September 4, 2007

  • Letters on a low, dishonest decade

    Here's a letter sent very recently by one of my more erudite colleagues to our three elected representatives in Washington.  I've truncated his name to protect his privacy, though he does little to protect his own privacy.  The subject line is his.

    **********

    [I sent the following letter(s) to the slender reeds upon which our
    representation to the federal government rests. --CGE]

    September 1, 2007

    Senator Richard Durbin
    309 Hart Senate Building
    Washington, DC 20510

    [cc: Senator Barack Obama
    713 Hart Senate Office Building
    Washington, D.C. 20510]

    [cc: Representative Timothy V. Johnson
    1207 Longworth House Office Building
    Washington, D.C. 20515]

    Dear Senator Durbin:

    The rumored attack on Iran by the United States must be stopped, and it is
    your responsibility to do so.  You cannot acquiesce in the war crime that the
    Bush-Cheney administration seems about to commit.  Please do all that you can to
    prevent this enormity from occurring.

    An attack on Iran would obviously violate the United Nations Charter, which
    forbids "the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or
    political independence of any state."  American leaders would be guilty of what
    the German leaders were condemned for at Nuremberg -- "the planning,
    preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression." In a famous passage
    from their judgment, the four judges of the tribunal (American, British, French
    and Russian) declared the crime of aggressive war to be "the supreme
    international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains
    within itself the accumulated evil of the whole" -- i.e., even worse than
    terrorism.

    Of course the German leadership had excluded the legislature from the
    decision to wage aggressive war, so only the leaders were punished.  But if the
    Congress of which you are a member permits the executive to commit the supreme
    international crime, you too should be answerable before a new Nuremberg
    court.

    Sincerely,

    C. G. E.
    L. S. E.

    Enc.: W.H. Auden, SEPTEMBER 1, 1939

    =================
            
    SEPTEMBER 1, 1939
    W.H. Auden
            
    I sit in one of the dives
    On Fifty-second Street
    Uncertain and afraid
    As the clever hopes expire
    Of a low dishonest decade:
    Waves of anger and fear
    Circulate over the bright
    And darkened lands of the earth,
    Obsessing our private lives;
    The unmentionable odour of death
    Offends the September night.

    Accurate scholarship can
    Unearth the whole offence
    From Luther until now
    That has driven a culture mad,
    Find what occurred at Linz,
    What huge imago made
    A psychopathic god:
    I and the public know
    What all schoolchildren learn,
    Those to whom evil is done
    Do evil in return.

    Exiled Thucydides knew
    All that a speech can say
    About Democracy,
    And what dictators do,
    The elderly rubbish they talk
    To an apathetic grave;
    Analysed all in his book,
    The enlightenment driven away,
    The habit-forming pain,
    Mismanagement and grief:
    We must suffer them all again.

    Into this neutral air
    Where blind skyscrapers use
    Their full height to proclaim
    The strength of Collective Man,
    Each language pours its vain
    Competitive excuse:
    But who can live for long
    In an euphoric dream;
    Out of the mirror they stare,
    Imperialism's face
    And the international wrong.

    Faces along the bar
    Cling to their average day:
    The lights must never go out,
    The music must always play,
    All the conventions conspire
    To make this fort assume
    The furniture of home;
    Lest we should see where we are,
    Lost in a haunted wood,
    Children afraid of the night
    Who have never been happy or good.

    The windiest militant trash
    Important Persons shout
    Is not so crude as our wish:
    What mad Nijinsky wrote
    About Diaghilev
    Is true of the normal heart;
    For the error bred in the bone
    Of each woman and each man
    Craves what it cannot have,
    Not universal love
    But to be loved alone.

    From the conservative dark
    Into the ethical life
    The dense commuters come,
    Repeating their morning vow;
    'I will be true to the wife,
    I'll concentrate more on my work,'
    And helpless governors wake
    To resume their compulsory game:
    Who can release them now,
    Who can reach the dead,
    Who can speak for the dumb?

    All I have is a voice
    To undo the folded lie,
    The romantic lie in the brain
    Of the sensual man-in-the-street
    And the lie of Authority
    Whose buildings grope the sky:
    There is no such thing as the State
    And no one exists alone;
    Hunger allows no choice
    To the citizen or the police;
    We must love one another or die.
    Defenseless under the night
    Our world in stupor lies;
    Yet, dotted everywhere,
    Ironic points of light
    Flash out wherever the Just
    Exchange their messages:
    May I, composed like them
    Of Eros and of dust,
    Beleaguered by the same
    Negation and despair,
    Show an affirming flame.

            ###

August 25, 2007

  • The Nation: The Enormous Cost of War

    August 17, 2007
    The Nation

    The Enormous Cost of War

    Katrina Vanden Heuvel

    The National Priorities Project (NPP), a research organization that analyzes
    and clarifies federal data so that people can understand how their tax dollars
    are spent, continues to be an invaluable resource when it comes to translating
    the costs of the Iraq War.

    $456 billion has now been appropriated for the war through September 30, and
    that's a difficult number to get a handle on. But as I've written previously, NPP
    spells out exactly what every state and district has paid towards this
    catastrophe and describes the spending priorities that could have been met with
    those same resources.

    For example, $456 billion could have provided over 48 million children with
    health care coverage for the length of the War; built 3.5 million affordable
    housing units; 45,800 elementary schools; hired 8 million additional public
    school teachers for a year; paid for nearly 60 million kids to attend Head
    Start; or awarded 22 million 4-year scholarships at public universities.
    Instead, we find our nation speeding towards what Nobel Prize-winning economist
    Joseph Stiglitz estimated as a final price tag - somewhere between $1 trillion
    and $2 trillion. . . .

    FULL TEXT