June 20, 2009
-
Just don't shoot the messenger....
As Bob Dylan sang, you don't have to be a weatherman to tell which way the wind is blowing...
Published on Monday, June 15, 2009 by TruthDig.comThe American Empire Is BankruptThis week marks the end of the dollar’s reign as the world’s reserve currency [1].
It marks the start of a terrible period of economic and political
decline in the United States. And it signals the last gasp of the
American imperium. That’s over. It is not coming back. And what is to
come will be very, very painful.Barack Obama, and the criminal class on
Wall Street, aided by a corporate media that continues to peddle
fatuous gossip and trash talk as news while we endure the greatest
economic crisis in our history, may have fooled us, but the rest of the
world knows we are bankrupt. And these nations are damned if they are
going to continue to prop up an inflated dollar and sustain the massive
federal budget deficits, swollen to over $2 trillion, which fund
America’s imperial expansion in Eurasia and our system of casino
capitalism. They have us by the throat. They are about to squeeze.There are meetings being held [2]
Monday and Tuesday in Yekaterinburg, Russia, (formerly Sverdlovsk)
among Chinese President Hu Jintao, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev
and other top officials of the six-nation Shanghai Cooperation
Organization. The United States, which asked to attend, was denied
admittance. Watch what happens there carefully. The gathering is, in
the words of economist Michael Hudson [3], “the most important meeting of the 21st century so far.”It is the first formal step by our major
trading partners to replace the dollar as the world’s reserve currency.
If they succeed, the dollar will dramatically plummet in value, the
cost of imports, including oil, will skyrocket, interest rates will
climb and jobs will hemorrhage at a rate that will make the last few
months look like boom times. State and federal services will be reduced
or shut down for lack of funds. The United States will begin to
resemble the Weimar Republic or Zimbabwe. Obama, endowed by many with
the qualities of a savior, will suddenly look pitiful, inept and weak.
And the rage that has kindled a handful of shootings and hate crimes in
the past few weeks will engulf vast segments of a disenfranchised and
bewildered working and middle class. The people of this class will
demand vengeance, radical change, order and moral renewal, which an
array of proto-fascists, from the Christian right to the goons who
disseminate hate talk on Fox News, will assure the country they will
impose.I called Hudson, who has an article in
Monday’s Financial Times called “The Yekaterinburg Turning Point:
De-Dollarization and the Ending of America’s Financial-Military
Hegemony.” “Yekaterinburg,” Hudson writes, “may become known not only
as the death place of the czars but of the American empire as well.”
His article is worth reading, along with John Lanchester’s disturbing exposé [4] of the world’s banking system, titled “It’s Finished,” which appeared in the May 28 issue of the London Review of Books.“This means the end of the dollar,” Hudson
told me. “It means China, Russia, India, Pakistan, Iran are forming an
official financial and military area to get America out of Eurasia. The
balance-of-payments deficit is mainly military in nature. Half of
America’s discretionary spending is military. The deficit ends up in
the hands of foreign banks, central banks. They don’t have any choice
but to recycle the money to buy U.S. government debt. The Asian
countries have been financing their own military encirclement. They
have been forced to accept dollars that have no chance of being repaid.
They are paying for America’s military aggression against them. They
want to get rid of this.”China, as Hudson points out, has already
struck bilateral trade deals with Brazil and Malaysia to denominate
their trade in China’s yuan rather than the dollar, pound or euro.
Russia promises to begin trading in the ruble and local currencies. The
governor of China’s central bank has openly called for the abandonment
of the dollar as reserve currency, suggesting in its place the use of
the International Monetary Fund’s Special Drawing Rights [5].
What the new system will be remains unclear, but the flight from the
dollar has clearly begun. The goal, in the words of the Russian
president, is to build a “multipolar world order” which will break the
economic and, by extension, military domination by the United States.
China is frantically spending its dollar reserves to buy factories and
property around the globe so it can unload its U.S. currency. This is why
Aluminum Corp. of China made so many major concessions in the failed
attempt to salvage its $19.5 billion alliance with the Rio Tinto mining
concern in Australia. It desperately needs to shed its dollars.“China is trying to get rid of all the
dollars they can in a trash-for-resource deal,” Hudson said. “They will
give the dollars to countries willing to sell off their resources since
America refuses to sell any of its high-tech industries, even Unocal,
to the yellow peril. It realizes these dollars are going to be
worthless pretty quickly.”The architects of this new global exchange
realize that if they break the dollar they also break America’s
military domination. Our military spending cannot be sustained without
this cycle of heavy borrowing. The official U.S. defense budget for
fiscal year 2008 is $623 billion, before we add on things like nuclear
research. The next closest national military budget is China’s, at $65
billion, according to the Central Intelligence Agency.There are three categories of the
balance-of-payment deficits. America imports more than it exports. This
is trade. Wall Street and American corporations buy up foreign
companies. This is capital movement. The third and most important
balance-of-payment deficit for the past 50 years has been Pentagon
spending abroad. It is primarily military spending that has been
responsible for the balance-of-payments deficit for the last five
decades. Look at table five in the Balance of Payments Report,
published in the Survey of Current Business quarterly, and check under
military spending. There you can see the deficit.To fund our permanent war economy, we have
been flooding the world with dollars. The foreign recipients turn the
dollars over to their central banks for local currency. The central
banks then have a problem. If a central bank does not spend the money
in the United States then the exchange rate against the dollar will go
up. This will penalize exporters. This has allowed America to print
money without restraint to buy imports and foreign companies, fund our
military expansion and ensure that foreign nations like China continue
to buy our treasury bonds. This cycle appears now to be over. Once the
dollar cannot flood central banks and no one buys our treasury bonds,
our empire collapses. The profligate spending on the military, some $1
trillion when everything is counted, will be unsustainable.“We will have to finance our own military
spending,” Hudson warned, “and the only way to do this will be to
sharply cut back wage rates. The class war is back in business. Wall
Street understands that. This is why it had Bush and Obama give it $10
trillion in a huge rip-off so it can have enough money to survive.”The desperate effort to borrow our way out
of financial collapse has promoted a level of state intervention unseen
since World War II. It has also led us into uncharted territory.“We have in effect had to declare war to
get us out of the hole created by our economic system,” Lanchester
wrote in the London Review of Books. “There is no model or precedent
for this, and no way to argue that it’s all right really, because under
such-and-such a model of capitalism ... there is no such model. It
isn’t supposed to work like this, and there is no road-map for what’s
happened.”The cost of daily living, from buying
food to getting medical care, will become difficult for all but a few
as the dollar plunges. States and cities will see their pension funds
drained and finally shut down. The government will be forced to sell
off infrastructure, including roads and transport, to private
corporations. We will be increasingly charged by privatized
utilities—think Enron—for what was once regulated and subsidized.
Commercial and private real estate will be worth less than half its
current value. The negative equity that already plagues 25 percent of
American homes will expand to include nearly all property owners. It
will be difficult to borrow and impossible to sell real estate unless
we accept massive losses. There will be block after block of empty
stores and boarded-up houses. Foreclosures will be epidemic. There will
be long lines at soup kitchens and many, many homeless. Our
corporate-controlled media, already banal and trivial, will work
overtime to anesthetize us with useless gossip, spectacles, sex,
gratuitous violence, fear and tawdry junk politics. America will be
composed of a large dispossessed underclass and a tiny empowered
oligarchy that will run a ruthless and brutal system of neo-feudalism
from secure compounds. Those who resist will be silenced, many by
force. We will pay a terrible price, and we will pay this price soon,
for the gross malfeasance of our power elite.© 2009 TruthDig.com
Comments (21)
I am so thankful for a garden,canning shelves and a spring for water!
As my head spins I think I will pour another galss of wine
@seedsower - And your house paid for, I hope? Those things will stand you in good stead. I, of course, am not so fortunate.
and if there is one thing for sure, I really have a hard time understanding the workings of world financial markets
@valis10 - Well, Jim, your own Xanga page starts out by proclaiming "Fear No Darkness". If you follow your own advice, you should be all set.
Yes John, it is. We own very little in the way of worldly things like big TV's and electronics,new cars...we make do or do without...but it has enabled us to live debt free.
haha I am smiling now! but I will be buying that 9mm pistol as soon as I can get to the store.
THIS IS NOT THE SORT OF NEWS I LIKE TO WAKE UP TO, JOHN!
Screw this. I'm moving to Canada.
A very well informed post, as usual. People need to wake up to these facts and stop thinking America is still the land of milk and honey. As things get worse, most Americans are looking to the government to bail them out of their financial difficulties and don't realize that Uncle Sams helping everyone is one of the many reasons we are where we are today. You don't post often but when you do, it's always exceptional.
"The class war is back in business!" A very interesting text. I'm in Europe, with money in France and England. I suspect the Euro will become a very storng currency soon and figure I'd better get my sterling into France before sterling follows the dollar into the big black hole.
My brother sent me something similar recently. He's been crying gloom and doom and buying up weapons like a crazy man. I don't want to stick my head in the sand, but neither do I want to give in to depair.
Hello~ I'm finally making my way back slowly to xanga.
Thanks for the article. Weird how I can't find any articles about the meeting on FT, Economist, or WSJ... I think all the mainstream media outlets are too busy woo-ahhing over the role of Twitter in getting out the Iran news.
This VOA article was slightly interesting but too short on details.
http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-06-16-voa13.cfm
"Summit host Dmitri Medvedev called for new standards
to regulate international financial markets and institutions. He again
urged creation of new international reserve currencies, saying the
global system cannot be successful if it relies on the U.S. dollar.
The Russian leader also noted the need for cooperation in such areas as
energy, trade, food production, and security."
@gpspacey - It's good to see you again, Grace. Here's another article about this new Sino-Soviet rapprochement, from the June 14 issue of the London-based Financial Times:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e9104e82-58f7-11de-80b3-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1
I've seen other articles about it also.
@fratmom - @Eccentrique -
Thank you Frat Mom for asking me to weigh in on this issue. After doing some research on the above writer, Chris Hedges, I can honestly say that I am on my way to having a new addition to my wall of thinkers and writers I admire. His book on the apologist atheist and the religious right both seem spot on in analysis and his reasoning on the handful of youtube interviews I have viewed leave me with a healthy respect for the Harvard thinker.
That said there are many points in this particular article that I object to, objection it should be noted not from anger, but simple disagreement.
The overarching thesis of this column is that the U.S. dollar has declined to the point that the U.S. will now face permanent damage as a world superpower.
This analysis is based on the observation that the U.S. is now deep in debt, not only to its own people, but also various other foreign countries throughout the world.
Hedges claims that the various other emerging powers (India, China, Brazil) and old foes (Russia, Iran) are now in league to drive America out of the picture in Eurasia. He cites as evidence for this claim the recently formed Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Hedges makes it seem like the SCO is just now pushing the U.S. out of its membership by denying the States a seat in this organization now, as it discusses the global financial situation. This is a misrepresentation of facts. The U.S. applied for observer status long before the above mentioned conference and was denied entry as late as 2005. This exclusion has nothing to do with the state of the dollar but instead the overarching goal of the SCO, which is to serve as a counter to the power of NATO. Hedges conviently fails to mention that not a single full fledged western nation of NATO is a full member of SCO.
The argument could be made that the mere formation of SCO shows the U.S. is in permanent decline but this claim shows a serious lack of international history. The Central Powers, the Axis Powers, the League of Nations, the European Union, the Soviet Union are all examples of powerful international alliances (well to call the League powerful may be a stretch) that did not include the U.S. for various reasons. The U.S. was able to survive every single one, and in many ways competed quite well.
Finally Hedges makes many speculations and attempts to pass them off as the gospel, "And it signals the last gasp of the American imperium. That’s over. It is not coming back." I say this with respect, but Hedges is not a fortune teller with a magic crystal ball. This borderlines on fear mongering, because there is no way that one can prove or disprove that claim.
Inflation and the fall of the dollar is serious, but the Fed has the power to print (what it has recently done) to stave off a deep recession, but it also has the power to pull that currency out of the market before inflation occurs. This will be difficult but we did it before and despite what Hedges claims we can do it again. The recession will eventually end, that much people can be sure of, but to draw the conclusion from the recession that the U.S. is finished is oversimplifying and laughable.
After watching Hedges in interviews I am seriously surprised that he authored this article. If I did not know better I would say that someone is using his name.
@Confessions_of_a_Liberal - Very good analysis... though I have to disagree on some points.
"The U.S. applied for observer status long
before the above mentioned conference and was denied entry as late as
2005. This exclusion has nothing to do with the state of the dollar but
instead the overarching goal of the SCO, which is to serve as a counter
to the power of NATO."
That would've been helpful if the author mentioned it... thanks for the research. FT article that Eccentrique shared with me also says the same thing: "US officials wanted to attend Yekaterinburg as observers. They were told no." Perhaps both your finding and the authors are correct? US could've been denied in 2005, then again in 2009? Just speculating, but I don't see why US would've given up trying to attend SCO. Perhaps Obama administration thought they would be treated differently from W.
"Inflation and the fall of the dollar is
serious, but the Fed has the power to print (what it has recently done)
to stave off a deep recession, but it also has the power to pull that
currency out of the market before inflation occurs."
I thought most central banks had the power to print money (except for EU's central bank, I believe?), so why is US Fed so special? The power to pull currency out of the market comes either from increasing interest rates (which would exascerbate the inflationary trend), or by issuing more long-term debt (didn't the Fed buy back a lot of TBills lately to increase liquidity?). I'm no economist so what I understand is rather basic, but these two things don't seem like a good solution to the current dollar problem when so many buyers are weary of the US debt.
You're right that Hedges sounds like fear mongering, but if the threat looks real, based on cool-headed analysis, on mounting evidence, then perhaps raising the alarm is a good thing? Like Jim Hansen is considered a fear monger for the gloom-doom warnings about global warming, but Hansen has been proven consistently right in his past predictions, and no there is no way to prove/disprove his claims because he's working in an uncharted territory. The dollar crisis feels the same, except it's not going to threaten humanity... just our crazy way of living.
@Confessions_of_a_Liberal - Thank you for the detailed analysis. It brings some hope to a tired old body.
@gpspacey - Long time no talk, glad to hear from you. As I'm sure you know I have left Pilgrim of Truth and am now having a good ol' time over here at Confessions. Stop by sometime. You're views are always welcome.
I agree that Hedges was correct in stating that the U.S. was denied entry into SCO but I disagree with the way he presented the fact. In this column he makes it appear as if the SCO did so out of fear of the faltering economy, not the fact that SCO would never allow the U.S. in for its main purpose, which is to challenge the monopoly of NATO.
I too am by no means an economist but the Fed has the power to regulate the flow of currency. My point of including it in the response was to show that Hedges analysis of the dollar being sentenced to death is incorrect. There are still options open for the American people to rebound their currency.
Hedges analysis is different from Global Warming advocates because in the latter case Hedges is dealing with an occurence of social science, and a phenomena that has many, many variables. Therefore to predict his outcome with such certainty is off base. Global warming has to deal with natural science, and is confirmed by many different researchers.
Hedges claims COULD come true, but the probablity of everything occuring in the exact manner that he described is highly improbable.
@fratmom - Glad I could help. Thanks for stopping by the site. Don't be a stranger, I always enjoy talking to engaged, and energetic bloggers.
It's simple what they're doing right now, eliminating the poor and keep the rich. But guess what? The rich depends on the poor to multiply their wealth and it has been for wow, since the beginning of time, without that tactic, are they gonna be working as a greeter at wal-mart, cut some rich lawn or counting their money at a bank?
@Confessions_of_a_Liberal - @gpspacey - There's a lot more economics in the article than either of you has alluded to. None of us is an economist, so we're all kind of pissing in the wind, so to speak. I just know that our military power, and the fact that the dollar has been the world's default currency for so long, has somehow allowed us to exploit the rest of the world while keeping our own prices (on oil, for example), artificially low, thus subsidizing our profligate American lifestyle. Now that the rest of the world has gotten wise - not only this new Sino-Soviet rapprochement, but the European Union and the nascent alliance of Central and South American countries - our domination of the world is essentially over. The American rich will continue to thrive - in large part because their wealth isn't really even tied any more to America - but the poor and middle class in America will suffer an even further erosion of their standard of living. Whoever thinks we're going to somehow bounce back and be the America that we were in the 1950s and 1960s is living in a dream world.
@Eccentrique - @fratmom - @gpspacey - I take a different stance then Hedges or you Eccentrique in the light of the 21st century international political arrangement. My thinking is much more in line with Fareed Zakaria of Newsweek in his views that the U.S. should not fear the rise of other countries but be happy that the dream America has had of the rest of the world industrializing and rising up is finally here. This view is well explained in his article The Rise of the Rest and his book by the same title.
Comments are closed.